Iran has told the International Atomic Energy Agency that talks on resuming nuclear monitoring cannot proceed while the country remains under the threat of American military attack, according to a confidential agency report circulated to member states on Friday, November 13, 2026. The message, seen by The Associated Press, puts Tehran's refusal in writing since inspectors lost access to its damaged nuclear sites.

In the report, Iran pointed to "a series of persistent, explicit, and public threats by the President of the United States of America ... to commit further acts of armed aggression" against Iran, "particularly targeting its nuclear facilities". Tehran said the situation will not be resolved "until the root causes of the present situation are addressed and the essential requirements for normal safeguards implementation are restored".

Key Points

• Iran told the IAEA nuclear monitoring talks cannot proceed while it faces US military threats, per a confidential report circulated on Friday, November 13, 2026.
• Tehran cited what it called persistent, explicit and public threats by President Donald Trump to commit further armed aggression, particularly against its nuclear facilities.
• The IAEA warned the lack of information about Iran's atomic sites and nuclear material is "a matter of proliferation concern" that "needs to be rectified with the utmost urgency".
• Iran has barred inspectors from nuclear sites damaged in the June 2025 Israeli and US strikes; Bushehr is the only facility inspected since.
• IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has warned the unverified highly enriched uranium stockpile could theoretically provide material for as many as 10 nuclear weapons.

What Happened

The confidential report was circulated to the agency's member states on Friday, and its contents were reported by The Associated Press after seeing the document. It is the latest quarterly account of a safeguards system that has effectively stopped working in Iran: inspectors have had no access to the country's nuclear facilities since the 12-day war in June 2025, when Israeli and American strikes damaged several sites.

The agency also raised fresh concern about the Isfahan Fuel Enrichment Plant, a site Iran declared in June 2025 but has never allowed inspectors to visit. The IAEA said it was increasingly concerned about the underground plant and did not know its exact location, its status for safeguards purposes, or whether it contains nuclear material.

Background and Context

The monitoring blackout dates to the 12-day war in June 2025, when Israeli and US strikes hit Iran's nuclear sites. Since then, Iran has not given IAEA inspectors access to any of the damaged facilities. The Bushehr nuclear power plant is the only site the agency has been able to inspect since the strikes. Before those strikes, the agency estimated that Iran held 440.9 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity, close to weapons-grade. Inspectors have since been unable to verify the stockpile, and the agency says it cannot conclude that no nuclear material has been diverted from peaceful activities.

The standoff unfolds against a war now in its ninth month, which began on February 28, 2026. Vice President JD Vance said on November 2 that Washington had made progress in talks with Iran and that the United States had set no deadline for a deal, while President Donald Trump said the same day that an agreement was "coming together very nicely". The United States carried out strikes on Iran's Qeshm Island, which Trump confirmed and described as a minor attack.

Iran IAEA Nuclear Monitoring Stalls as Threats Continue

The core of the dispute is what "normal safeguards implementation" requires. For the IAEA, it means inspectors on the ground, cameras and seals at declared sites, and the ability to account for every gram of enriched uranium. For Iran, the report suggests, it also means an end to the threats it says are aimed at those same facilities.

Iran did not close the door entirely. The report records Tehran reaffirming its "firm commitment to resume full implementation of its safeguards obligations as soon as the relevant legal and actual conditions permit it". The IAEA says it is ready to return at short notice; Iran says the conditions do not exist while the threats continue. Neither side has put a date on a resolution.

Reactions and Quotes

Tehran's language in the report was unusually direct, citing the threats from Trump and saying the situation will not be resolved "until the root causes of the present situation are addressed and the essential requirements for normal safeguards implementation are restored".

The IAEA answered with its own warning, calling the information gap "a matter of proliferation concern" that "needs to be rectified with the utmost urgency". Director General Rafael Grossi warned the unverified stockpile of highly enriched uranium could theoretically provide material for as many as 10 nuclear weapons.

Why It Matters

The monitoring gap matters because verification is the only mechanism that can settle, with evidence, whether Iran's nuclear programme remains peaceful. When the IAEA says it cannot conclude that no material has been diverted, it is saying the system designed to catch a weapons programme early no longer works in Iran.

It also matters for the diplomacy around the war. The Trump administration has said its top priority is a firm, verifiable commitment that Iran will not rebuild its nuclear programme. A deal that cannot be verified is no deal at all, and the IAEA's report shows verification is currently impossible.

What Happens Next

The immediate next step lies in the diplomacy between Washington and Tehran. The IAEA has said it is ready to resume its work at short notice, so the practical question is whether the political conditions Iran demands can be met, and whether the United States is willing to offer the assurances Tehran says it needs.

Watch for the agency's next quarterly report, which will show whether any access has been restored. Vance has said there is no strict deadline for a settlement, but the longer the monitoring gap lasts, the harder it becomes to verify any agreement eventually reached.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Iran tell the IAEA?
Iran told the agency nuclear monitoring talks cannot proceed while it is under threat of military attack, citing what it called persistent, explicit and public threats by President Donald Trump.

Why can't the IAEA monitor Iran's nuclear sites?
Iran has not given inspectors access to sites damaged in the Israeli and US strikes of June 2025. Bushehr is the only facility inspected since.

What is the Isfahan Fuel Enrichment Plant?
An underground uranium-enrichment plant Iran declared in June 2025 that inspectors have never visited. The IAEA does not know its exact location or whether it contains nuclear material.

How much uranium is unverified?
Before the June 2025 strikes, the IAEA estimated Iran held 440.9 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity — enough, Grossi warned, for as many as 10 nuclear weapons in theory.

What happens next?
The IAEA says it is fully prepared to resume safeguards work at short notice. Iran says it will resume full implementation when the legal and actual conditions permit, but has given no date.